The rail services provided are some of the most expensive, yet poorly run in the world. People are forced to drive for convenience, which is damaging our environment.

Kimberley Parker, New Milton

Safety and efficiency before profit.

Viv Owen, Bradford

People before profits!

Lee Garratt, Braunston

There is no valid reason for keeping the railways in private hands. The model has miserably failed. This is resulting in underused transport rail service and clogged roads.

Neraj Sharma, Milton Keynes

It should never have been sold off in the first place.

Keith Hitchings, Queenborough

Hand out subsidies (from our taxes) to hand them to investors? It makes no sense.

Hugh Gurney, Glasgow

Pre-privatisation message read if it ain’t broke don’t fix it. Now it is broken we have to try to fix it. Sign up and let Cameron know we’re out there.

Gordon Dowell, Gillingham, Kent

Railways should be solely under the control of Government and run for the benefit of people and not private profit.

Anne Mead, Tewin

Nationalise the railways. They should be run as a service not for greedy profit.

Julie Bedington, Malvern

This week’s announcement that the East Coast rail network has returned £1billion to the taxpayers’ purse should be a nail in the coffin for the madness of privatisation.

James York, Edinburgh

I know a few of us re-nationalisers round here. Could we hold a meeting or action?

Julian Wilson, Tonbridge

How much more can the ordinary person take? Let down by politicians and bankers and held to ransom by the greed of the people running virtually everything else.

Rosemary Blake, London

Our rail system should be run purely for public service as it is in a lot of other European countries.

Elaine Barraud, Godalming

Network rail is going bust.

Nigel Brown, Portsmouth

This country needs to catch up with the rest of Europe by having a viable public transport system.

Simon Short, Rochdale

All the private owners want is profit, at a cost to safety, passenger care and just about anything. The amount of subsidies they get. Bring BR back.

Lennie Brooks, Southampton

There are some services the market can’t effectively provide and a rail network is one. It’s a costly experiment gone wrong and it’s time to wake up to common sense.

Jonathan Martin, Lancaster

East Coast shows we can run trains, without private companies getting the subsidies for their profits.

David Bowers, Glasgow

I have been disgusted with the poor running of trains in the UK with the exceptions of Virgin Trains, which the coalition want to change, and East Coast Line, which is public.

Margaret Littlejohn, Newark

The privatisation of the UK’s rail network has not led to lower fares and better service. Rail companies put shareholders’ dividends before fare-paying customers. BBBR.

Paul Campbell, London

It seems the companies running the railways right now think they can get away with anything and not be held accountable.

Amanda Kay, Heywood

Neither trains, railways nor buses should ever have been privatised. High prices for poor transport services. Nationalised would be better maintenance/service/price.

Susan Dawson, Rosudgeon

The ludicrously complicated fare structures have to go.

Kathryn Thomas, Radcliffe-on-Trent

Remove the strata of capitalist greed that impoverishes the rest of us who are not shareholders.

Ray Grinney, Deal

Privatisation has channelled public funds into private hands and left us with one of the most expensive and least efficient railways. We must renationalise now.

William Quick, Bristol

It’s about time that railways become publicly owned, to keep control of the cost and we massively need to improve the quality and culture of travelling.

Ali Newton, Warminster

Bring back BR. Do not privatise East Coast!

Jim Brettell, Leeds

Billions wasted in annual share dividends which could be used to improve rail service.

Gary Tallant, Liversedge

Public services are public assets.

David Fearnhead, Nottingham

East Coast is an example of how much better it is not to have the railway privatised. The further advantage there used to be of one unified system would be welcome.

Carole Green, York